Skip to content
Free tools Let's talk

Free tool

Color blindness simulator

Upload an image or paste a color palette and see it as people with protanopia, deuteranopia, tritanopia and achromatopsia see it. For palettes, the simulator lists the pairs of colors that become hard to tell apart, so you know what to fix before the design ships.

1Choose what to test

Test

100%

2Compare

Everything runs in your browser. Images and colors are processed on your device and never uploaded or stored.

Beyond the tool

If your colors clash for 1 in 12 men, the site has other gaps too.

We audit websites against WCAG 2.2, from contrast and color use to keyboard access and screen readers, and fix what fails.

Get an accessibility audit proposalA fixed-price proposal within one working day

The guide

Color Blindness Simulator: the complete guide

5 referencesMethodology and limitsUpdated 16 October 2026

Built and maintained by the designers and marketers at DEMARCA, an award-winning design studio in Portugal.

On this page
  1. How to use the color blindness simulator
  2. The four types of color blindness simulated
  3. What to do when colors clash
  4. How the simulation works
  5. Methodology and limits
  6. Sources

How to use the color blindness simulator

  1. Choose a palette or an image. Paste your brand or chart colors as hex codes, or upload a design, a chart or a screenshot of a page.
  2. Compare the views. The simulator shows your colors as they appear with each of four types of color blindness, side by side with normal color vision.
  3. Check the warnings. For a palette, every pair of colors that looks clearly different to you but close for a color-blind viewer is listed under the type that causes it. Those are the pairs to fix or to separate by something other than color.

The severity slider simulates milder forms. At 100% it shows dichromacy, where one type of cone does not work at all; lower values approximate the more common anomalous trichromacy, where a cone type works but responds to the wrong wavelengths.

The four types of color blindness simulated

TypeWhat is affectedColors that get confused
Protanopia (red-blind)The long-wavelength (L, red) conesRed and green, red and brown, purple and blue. Reds also look darker.
Deuteranopia (green-blind)The medium-wavelength (M, green) conesRed and green, green and brown, green and orange. Brightness is less affected.
Tritanopia (blue-blind)The short-wavelength (S, blue) conesBlue and green, yellow and pink or light gray, purple and red.
AchromatopsiaAll cone functionEvery hue. Only light and dark remain, as in a grayscale image.

Red-green color vision deficiency, the protan and deutan types together, is by far the most common: a 2012 review of prevalence studies put it at about 8% of men and 0.4% of women of European descent, with lower rates in most other populations. Tritan types are rare, and complete achromatopsia affects roughly 1 in 30,000 people. In a room of 50 men, odds are that a few of them do not see your red and green as two different colors.

What to do when colors clash

  • Do not rely on color alone. WCAG 2.2 success criterion 1.4.1 asks that color is never the only way to convey information. Add labels, icons, patterns or position: a red error state also gets an icon and a message, a chart line also gets a label at its end.
  • Separate by lightness. Two colors with very different lightness stay distinct for every viewer, including in grayscale. The achromatopsia view is a quick test: if two colors look the same gray, change the lightness of one.
  • Avoid the classic pairs. Red with green, green with brown, blue with purple and light green with yellow cause most of the problems. Blue with orange is a safer pair for two-series charts.
  • Check text contrast separately. Telling colors apart and reading text on a background are two different tests. Use the color contrast checker for text.

A simulation is a model of the average dichromat, not what every person sees. Color vision varies, and the only reliable test of a design is feedback from color-blind users. Use the simulator to catch the obvious problems early.

How the simulation works

Each color is converted from sRGB to linear light, multiplied by a 3 × 3 matrix that models the missing or shifted cone response, and converted back. The matrices for protanopia, deuteranopia and tritanopia are the ones published by Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes in 2009, a physiologically based model that is widely used in research and accessibility tools. Achromatopsia is simulated with the relative luminance weights of the sRGB standard, the same weights WCAG uses to compute contrast.

For the palette warnings, the simulator measures the difference between every pair of colors with the CIEDE2000 formula, before and after simulation. A pair is flagged when it is clearly different in normal vision (a difference of 10 or more) but falls under 10 in the simulated view. The value 10 is this tool's choice: small enough to flag only real clashes, large enough that close shades in a chart are caught.

Methodology and limits

Model
Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes (2009) matrices for severity 1.0, applied in linear RGB. Lower severities are a linear blend between the identity and the full matrix, an approximation of the paper's own per-severity matrices.
Achromatopsia
Gray with the relative luminance Y = 0.2126 R + 0.7152 G + 0.0722 B of linear sRGB, blended with the original at lower severities.
Palette check
CIEDE2000 color difference between every pair, flagged when the original difference is 10 or more and the simulated difference is under 10.
Images
Images are decoded by your browser and processed at up to 1,200 pixels on the longest side for the preview. Downloads use the same size. Colors are treated as sRGB.
Limits
The model describes typical dichromats; real color vision varies by person, by lighting and by screen. It does not simulate low vision, blur or blue-yellow anomalous trichromacy beyond the linear blend.

Sources

FAQ

Questions people ask

Can I upload an image to see it as a color-blind person would?

Yes. Choose An image, then drop or paste a design, chart, photo or screenshot. You get the original next to protanopia, deuteranopia, tritanopia and achromatopsia versions, each downloadable as a PNG. The image never leaves your device.

How do I check a design for color blind accessibility?

Test the palette here to find pairs that become hard to tell apart, make sure color is never the only way information is shown (WCAG success criterion 1.4.1), and check text contrast with a contrast checker. Then ask color-blind users for feedback.

Is there a free color blind image converter?

This one is free, with no sign up and no upload: the simulation runs in your browser. Each simulated version can be downloaded as a PNG to share with your team or add to a design review.

What is the most common type of color blindness?

Red-green color vision deficiency. A 2012 review of prevalence studies found it in about 8% of men and 0.4% of women of European descent. The milder green-weak form, deuteranomaly, is the most common of all.

Which colors should I avoid for color-blind users?

Avoid relying on red against green, green against brown, blue against purple and light green against yellow. Pairs that differ strongly in lightness, or blue with orange, stay distinct for most viewers. Labels and icons help more than any color choice.

How accurate is the simulation?

It uses the model of Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes (2009), widely used in research and accessibility tools. It represents a typical dichromat; real color vision varies from person to person, and your screen and lighting affect what you see.

What does the severity slider do?

At 100% it simulates dichromacy, where one cone type is missing. Lower values blend toward normal vision to approximate anomalous trichromacy, the milder and more common form, where a cone type works but is shifted.

More free tools

See all 52 tools

Accessibility audit

Let's make something matter.

We audit websites against WCAG 2.2, from contrast and color use to keyboard access and screen readers, and fix what fails. Independent design and marketing studio in Portugal. Senior-led projects, transparent pricing and clearly defined deliverables for international clients.

  • A reply from a designer within one working day
  • A fixed-price proposal before any work starts
  • Senior-led work with clearly defined deliverables
  • Clients in Portugal, across Europe and further afield

Request a quote

Prefer email? hello@wearedemarca.com